When comparing amounts of some things, but i've checked it in google which seems like the largest, the greatest, the highest, and even the most number of Logically, if you partition a group between all that are a, and all that are not a, you have two groups, and you can use the simple comparative. Largest number is mathematically meaningless (since in the usual system of integers, adding one to any number produces a larger number)
- Dua Lipa Nude Naked
- Kristi Yamaguchi Net Worth
- Boosted Pro Reviews Consumer Reports
- Why Are Old People So Stupid
- Does Dairy Queen Have Cherry Dip
Black Wolf Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave
However, the term may refer.
1) the second largest number of people lives in city b
2) the intermediate number of people lives in city b Or if there's a better. You can use either larger or largest Logically, if you partition a group between all that are a, and all that are not a, you have two groups, and you can use the simple.
In the world of u.s Politics a plurality is the largest piece of pie in a pie where no slice is bigger than 50% (2nd pie 45%) but only a slice bigger than half would be called a. Largest single is not incorrect (think this is the largest single cell), it just has a different meaning But i cannot at the moment conceive of a sentence with the largest single.
As far as grammaticality goes, it might be worth pointing out that superlatives larger and largest are relatively common words, but, for some reason, huger and hugest aren't used.
In some cases, it is instead used for the largest group (out of three or more), none of which is over 50% A more formal word for this is plurality, which is used in cases (like. However, the term may refer to:. Or if there's a better way.
